Let's Take This Outside
My entire family comes from Ireland, which makes me an authority on the art of arguing. I’ve never understood some people’s aversion to it. While many argue to win, wise men and women argue to learn.
What can be learned from a prolonged argument in the form of a race between Senator Rod Smith and US Representative Jim Davis for the Democratic nomination for governor? Heads are spinning over endorsements – most recently Bob Butterworth signed on to work for Smith while Bob Graham backed Davis a while ago. Each side desperately needs money, so doesn’t a divided party lead to divided resources? In the end, when we finally have a nominee, will he be so far behind in finances that the race is over before it begins?
Or will a hotly contested race guarantee more attention and, as a result, better voter turnout?
Either way, we'll learn something. Won't we?
7 Comments:
Does it really matter in the end? I mean, if there's not an R after their name they aint gonna win!
At least you will learn where your party stands on the issues, and just how many of you defected to vote GOP in the General Election.
That argument is so five minutes ago. Y'all aren't as hot as you used to be.
start winning, then you get to make that argument. sizzle baby.
Start winning? Jim Davis hasn't lost an election yet and has incredible support in the conservative community - obviously. Besides, right about now, people are realizing all the negatives to Repubs running the show. That they should have realized it before - is beside the point.
we will see.
Do both of you have to try to have the last word often? Crazy kids.
Crazy about each other! ;-) And neither wants to change a winning game.
Post a Comment
<< Home