Grilled Cheese
Yesterday, Senators questioned Attorney General Alberto "Torture? Big Fan!" Gonzales. He continued to defend the President's policy of illegal eavesdropping. (For a recap, go here, along with a sad-but-probably-true conclusion.)
I understand when neocons protect their own - such dishonorable displays are expected. However, when they suggest that the President is above the law, Repubs betray their own values and sink deeper into the mire that will eventually suffocate all of us and no doubt embarrass our children.
This clip sums up the issue perfectly. Of course, first you must sit through a whack-job caller who needs to lay off caffeine and non-stop Fox News. Quote of the day: "The scandal is about whether or not we live under the rule of law and that is not a conservative or a liberal debate. That is an American value and for that reason there are numerous conservatives-and I don't mean wishy-washy conservatives - I mean hardcore doctrinaire conservatives from Grover Norquist and Bob Barr... Nobody is against eavesdropping on the terrorists."
Oh, and what this guy said. Specifically: "What Patrick Henry once called 'the lamp of experience' needs to be brought into the shadowy space in which we have all been living since Sept. 11. My tentative conclusion is that the light it sheds exposes the ghosts and goblins of our traumatized imaginations. It is completely understandable that those who lost loved ones on that date will carry emotional scars for the remainder of their lives. But it defies reason and experience to make Sept. 11 the defining influence on our foreign and domestic policy. History suggests that we have faced greater challenges and triumphed, and that overreaction is a greater danger than complacency."
Through all the spin cycles, I have yet to hear an answer to the most important question: Why was it necessary to avoid the FISA court? Go ahead and tell us all, Gonzo. The President's men aren't the only ones listening.
10 Comments:
It's not Torture, it's "Freedom Tickle"
Well, if that's all it is...sign me up. ;-)
Respectfully Kate you and the left are wrong on these matters. No one is listening to your phone calls. They are barely paying attention to this blog. If "civil liberties" have to be suspended while we keep an eye and ear on nut jobs willing to blow crap up over a cartoon then so be it. I believe the majority of Americans don't think they will ever be "spied" on. What is the left so afraid of? And as far as the Gonzales hearings go, they don't matter. You guys can't even get him under oath. That's toothless. And the op-ed on if we are overreacting to 9-11. Overreacting? I'd like to know that I can stand on top of any skyscraper in the US and not get blown apart by some lunatics who get their towels in a wad over the sunday funnies. Freedom of speech is alive and well in the US, demonstarted by this blog and millions of others. And if "they" take you away for some disparaging comment about the president I'll be the first one to hold a "Free Kate" rally.
Hmmm, sounds like a certain anonymous person is paying attention to this blog.
At least you can take comfort that anonymous will be visiting you in Gitmo.
Tickle tickle.
Hey, where's Mr. C on this?
Pat said:
http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=48648
What was up with Teddy Kennedy at the King funeral by the way? Did he forget his brother was the one wiretapping MLK?
http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/prem/200207/garrow
Good links. As far as Pat and other conservatives go - I'd like to see some Dems speak out against Bush with such eloquence.
BTW - I'd love a "Free Kate" rally. That and an FBI file would be my childhood dreams come true.
"They are barely paying attention to this blog" is just plain mean.
Here's a newsflash for you: The left isn't the only side up in arms about this. Anyone who reveres our Constitution has a dog in this fight. Just because it might never affect me doesn't mean I'm not concerned. Do we live under the rule of law or don't we? Legal abortion, miranda rights, and a host of other protections don't apply to me either but I don't want the President deciding which he'll follow and which he'll break while shamefully blaming such transgressions on the "war on terror".
amen sister. i like your blog.
Post a Comment
<< Home