Tuesday, November 28, 2006

There's a Commotion

The thrust of this article is stem-cell research and whether Florida should fund such research. With its potential to cure so many diseases, funding stem cell research should be a no-brainer - which is why the religious right is against it. In fact, they're against using "the brain" altogether.

Two amendments will likely appear on the '08 ballot - one for state funding and the other against it. I found this part of the article most troubling:

The stem-cell questions typify the kinds of polarizing groups that try to amend
their positions into the state Constitution, said Stephen MacNamara, a
communications professor at Florida State University who worked on the campaign
that defeated a gambling ballot initiative in 1994.

"These people tend to be on the fringes; they feel like they have no alternative but this because the Legislature won't listen to them," he said. "It becomes an all-or-nothing, up-or-down, left-or-right approach [to policymaking], and it's not healthy."
Wrong, Stevie.

These people represent the concerns of thousands and thousands of Floridians who have no other voice. Our representatives in Tallahassee certainly aren't listening. Coming together and demanding change through our Constitution is one of the healthiest responses to such apathy. (Voting their asses out of office is yet another.)

7 Comments:

At 11/28/2006, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Kate, I think the important thing to remember here is that you apparently live in Third World Hell Hole.

 
At 11/29/2006, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Miami != All Of Florida

The Tampa/St. Pete metro area represents the 12th largest TV market in the country. Miami/Ft. Lauderdale is mere 17th. Orlando 20th.

We have hosted 3 NFL Super Bowls, our local football team won one a few years back. Our hockey team won the Stanley Cup too.

The Tampa Bay Area is not exactly small potatoes. And I am sick and tired of people thinking that Florida is just Miami, a Mouse, and some hanging frakking chads!!!!!

 
At 11/29/2006, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Look at it this way, Kate, you'll have plenty of things/stories/people to blog about when you FINALLY move out here. LOTS of great material!!

About that Tancredo nut-job...can you believe he actually got reelected?!

 
At 12/04/2006, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Dueling petition drives may be the only way for the public to deal with a dysfunctional Republican legislative leadership. That was how we dealt with medical malpractice when the Republicans used the issue to draw money from doctors and insurance companies instead of finding a compromise.

But do we need to amend the constitution so that more money is spent on stem cell research in Florida? It seems so Republican to micromanage research with legislation or amendment.

Jeb! put together his back room deal to bring a Scripts research site to Palm Beach. They have tons of our tax money and I don't recall any restrictions to prevent them from using stem cells in their research. Did I miss something?

How about the Johhnie Byrd Alzheimer’s Center at USF? Do they have a ban on using stem cells?

Charlie Crist may appoint Trustees to run our Universities without an anti-stem cell litmus test. We will know soon enough. If this is the case then our researchers will be free to decide the appropriate level of funding for stem cell research. They will be better informed than we voters.

I have more questions than answers but the people who ask us to change our constitution should have a clear explanation for why change is needed. When in doubt I vote no and I think that I will be voting no on both of these amendments.

Disclosure: I am a pro-life Catholic and a Democrat. Yet I don't understand why it is considered pro-life to let an embryo die in a freezer and not to use it to help others. It is inconsistent. I could understand and support legislation to stop producing surplus embryos. State funded medical schools mass produce these embryos knowing that most of them will die.

The Bushes and Republican leaders are cynical hypocrites who exploit this issue to win elections and then do virtually nothing to reduce abortions.

 
At 12/04/2006, Anonymous Anonymous said...

You are the second person in two days to express that sentiment about the Bushes and Republicans.

You are right - no need to make and destroy more embryos; however, let's use what we have to improve life for those who suffer needlessly. No one on the opposite end of this issue has made any valid reason why throwing them away is better.

 
At 12/04/2006, Blogger Tom said...

I need to correct the spelling of the Scripps Research Institute.

The Times has a great story today about the money being skimmed off of their budget by politicians; "With a half-billion dollars being spent to bring the institute to Florida, some familiar names are among those benefiting." Here is the link http://www.sptimes.com/2006/12/04/Business/Getting_a_cut_from_Sc.shtml

 
At 12/04/2006, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I can just hear them now: so everyone benefits. Of course, some more than others.

BTW - big fan of Common Cause.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home