Wednesday, January 16, 2008

Suffer the Children

A few weeks ago, I got a phone call from the principal of my sons’ school. Seemed Youngest was involved in a scuffle with his classmate Allen*. As my peace-loving heart began to break, Principal said it was nothing to get upset about.

“While investigating this incident,” Principal said, “I’ve discovered that Allen had hit your son, and other children, a few times leading up to today. Your son went to several teachers for support and finally had had enough. So he turned around and stopped Allen from hitting him by pushing him away. Therefore, Youngest isn’t in any trouble. I will deal with Allen. In light of everything, Youngest’s behavior is understandable.”

I thanked Principal and hung up the phone. However, as I walked over to their school at the end of the day, I couldn’t comfort myself by completely agreeing with him. At the same time, I couldn’t bring myself to punish Youngest. We had a talk about Allen and the importance of staying away from him. And that was it.

I mentioned this to several friends and family members.

One dear friend said, “If a bully yelled at your son and he defended himself with words, you’d commend him. Well, if a bully threatens the kid physically and he defends himself physically, you should commend him as well. We can’t always respond to the physical with words and calm rationalization. Because it doesn’t work. We respond like to like.”

Another said, “Somebody got up in his grill and he defended himself. Good for him.”

Perhaps.

If you agree with the above sentiments, does your mind change with the knowledge that Allen is mentally handicapped?

As a special education teacher, for years I thought mainstreaming, the practice of educating the disabled along with non-disabled children, was a great idea. We hoped that disabled kids benefited from being around their peers and non-disabled kids learned tolerance and understanding.

Sometimes that can happen. One of my favorite stories this year was when Oldest came home and talked about Elaine*, a severely disabled child in his class. Elaine was walking down the steps and slipped. Oldest helped her down safely and she grabbed him and hugged him.

“It was in front of everyone,” he said, “and the kids started to laugh. I didn’t want Elaine to feel bad so I hugged her back. The other kids stopped laughing.”

Such lessons, and the leadership qualities they elicit, are invaluable. However, more often, I see frustration in students whose classroom time is interrupted by tantrums and inappropriate behavior. I’ve also seen evidence that severely disabled kids get frustrated as well, when they can’t perform or learn the same material easily grasped by their classmates. Children can sometimes be cruel and often overwhelmed teachers, who can’t possibly be everywhere at every time, are sometimes powerless to stop the taunts and abuse that occurs.

Do handicapped students belong in classes with non-disabled kids?

Recently The Gazette ran a series about a local special education student who was sexually assaulted in the hallway of her high school. Kalie McArthur was so disabled, she needed constant adult supervision.

She was left alone in the care of a peer buddy, a fifteen year-old boy, which resulted in tragic consequences. There are many people who handled this situation badly, as the article points out, but nowhere does it ask the relevant and important question: Is a high school, filled to capacity with 1600 kids, the proper place for such a girl?

Allen and my son get along fine now that Allen’s medicine has been altered to help him deal with anxiety. But I can’t help wondering, in the midst of trying to educate everyone equally, are we hurting the very kids we’re trying to help?

6 Comments:

At 1/16/2008, Anonymous Anonymous said...

kid did the right thing - disable/handicallped or not, once he hit he had to be stopped.

 
At 1/16/2008, Blogger Not a Granny said...

You have a very valid point. Maybe it depends on the level of disability? Does the level of responsibility of the parent also play into the decision?

Do you know what response the teachers took who were told about Allen's behavior?

 
At 1/16/2008, Blogger kate said...

You are right on. The parents definitely play a part. On the one hand, I wonder why parents sent this eighteen year-old to a busy high school and I don't understand the lack of involvement as evidenced by the fact they "didn't know" she was paired with a peer buddy. On the other hand, maybe they could not afford the round-the-clock personalized care Kalie so clearly needed. Which brings us back to my favorite topic: health care.

It's all connected.

As far as the teachers dealing with Allen, I think they were working hard to focus him and he was just getting a little out of control. Happens to the best of behaved kids before winter break. But one of the teachers let it slip that Allen's home life wasn't as structured as it needed to be.

Begins and ends with parents more than anyone. That's what I keep saying.

 
At 1/16/2008, Anonymous Anonymous said...

http://aprais.org/articles/EthicsOfBehaviorChangeNancyWeiss.pdf

 
At 1/16/2008, Blogger QuakerJono said...

You've raised good children. To hit or not to hit is something each person has to decide for themselves and it's sadly one of the choices that all maturing kids make. Youngest did what was instinctual and it's hard to fault him for it, regardless of outside circumstances. It really shouldn't matter one way or the other if the aggressor is fully functional or disabled. Morality isn't about what's done to you, it's about what you do to others. Someone else's mistake, no matter what the reasons are that lead to making it, doesn't give one free reign to make a similar mistake.

Unfortunately, instinctual isn't always right, so it's extra good that you talked to him about it and he's begun to understand what personal morality is all about and how holding onto ideals isn't always going to bring praise.

As for the mainstreaming issue, my aunt worked as a social working in the local school system with both handicapped and behaviorally challenged children and she always was against mainstreaming, although she admitted isolation also brought stresses. There's no good answer to this question and until we change a society that still wants to have as little to do as possible with those who are off the average, there won't be one.

 
At 1/16/2008, Anonymous Anonymous said...

it would be a study at work if Kate had a disabled child.

despite herself

how would it would it be rationalized?

or would you just stay in your house with "it"?

 

Post a Comment

<< Home