My Caucus
Twenty-one Democrats in my precinct attended the Colorado Caucus last night.
The last time a caucus was held, two people showed up. Therefore, twenty-one is considered a success.
Really, it’s a failure.
Back in Wesley Chapel, my home for almost six years, we had similar numbers of demoralized and conservative-Christian-fearing progressives. In our 2004 Democratic Primary, 150 voters came out and pulled the lever for their favorite candidate.
A pathetically low number, but better than the numbers here.
Voter turnout is one important reason we should do away with the caucus system and hold primaries instead. Primary voters get an entire day in which to take part in a process that lasts only a few minutes. In a caucus, interested party members must arrive on time for the 7pm straw poll or miss out entirely. Then they get to spend another hour or two listening to their neighbors argue over resolutions and whether Ernie the Neighborhood Drunk is fit to be an election judge.
After a long day of working and/or taking care of the kids, how happy do you think people were to crowd into a smelly classroom, sit and stare at me while I carried the nine and counted my toes trying to make the numbers come together on my Delegate Math Work Sheet?
Other friends who were stuck at more crowded caucuses had similar stories of tension and boredom.
One co-worker had to pay $22 for the privilege of volunteering as a delegate to the county assembly. That’s what she gets for registering Republican. I told her to cheer up; maybe she’ll get to kick Doug Bruce once for all of us.
An especially fun moment occurred when caucus-goers realized the straw poll wasn’t binding.
“You mean a delegate can attend the county assembly and stand for someone else? What’s to stop one of you from supporting Obama here tonight and then voting for Ralph Nader?”
What’s stopping me? Ummm. How about healthy brain cells and a bit of integrity?
Another co-worker told me about angry Edwards supporters who just couldn’t accept the fact that he’s no longer a viable option. Another colleague mentioned long-winded Ron Paul enthusiasts who wanted to argue until midnight because “this event should mean something more important than getting home in time to watch The Colbert Report.”
However, today our caucus is a thing of the past. Barack Obama and Mitt Romney won – which explains a lot about Colorado. Perhaps we’d have the same outcome if we were a primary state. Nevertheless, holding primaries is a more democratic way to ensure that as many as possible are involved in the process.
Of course, if Ernie the Drunk could fit a 7pm caucus into his busy schedule, what’s your excuse?
9 Comments:
You may be happy to know that even with the BS about how Dem votes would not count here in Florida, Pasco county Dems turned out in near record numbers. The turnout in Pasco was nearly double that of the Dem turnout for the last pres primary. We are making headway hear in Florida.
My excuse? I'm an idiot who didn't do the caucus math in time to realize that unaffiliated liberals couldn't participate and I missed the cutoff date to switch over to Dem. And I'm sure there's quite a line to kick Doug Bruce.
"hear in Florida" ? ... Well, I suppose, maybe they just opened a new Beltone Hearing Aid Center.
.... As for the Caucus system, agreed, it's antiquated and it stinks. I did my part, but, whatever.
And for anyone with some hope that the DNC would relent and allow Fla. Dem delegates in the show, forget about it. The DND late last year issued hotel assignments, guess what, F-L-A is O-U-T .. there are no more rooms in this town, and Florida is not on the list, those Dems was serious when they said no primaries before the end of Jan.
Florida shoulda listened up.
good analysis of the caucus system. my hat off to ernie who gave up valuable drinking time to do his duty.
If I had to vote for the Democratic nominee at this point in time, it would be for Barak Hussein Obama. It's been pointed out that he's clean and articulate, but also he gives a pretty speech, and he uses the words "change" and "hope" multiple times in just about every sentence. He evidently has hired a good focus group that has informed him that his constituency, in both the primary and eventually in the general election, is primarily made up of individuals who might have the marginal mental capacity to retain these two one-syllable words and act upon it, so I think it's important that a winning nominee has good focus group people. Besides, Oprah likes him and she did lose all that weight, and that should mean something.
Katie and all: They are talking about Florida and Michigan both getting make up elections.... Not another primary vote. Caucuses.
I shit you not
Hmmm. Including a few of the same buzzwords in every speech and staying "on message". Nope, can't think of any other politicians or elected officials who'd try that transparent a tactic.
Nope, can't think of any other politicians or elected officials who'd try that transparent a tactic.
Would you vote for them, though?
Anon5:45 has a point, if delivered in a fairly snarky fashion. While it's presumed that Obama has positions and policy recommendations, he is short on the specifics of both and seems content to be defined by his buzzwords, rather than just use them.
In comparison to the other candidates, Obama is a young pup. Paul's been in politics since 1971, McCain since the early 80s and Hillary, well, wasn't Bill elected governor in 1978 or somewhere around then? All these candidates have had years to polish, package and promote their political messages and their actual plans. Plus, they each have a wealth of legislative efforts and votes to draw upon in their past to flesh out their stances.
Obama, by comparison, has none of this. Consequently, he needs to be a lot more forthcoming on specific details if he really wants to steal the nomination away from Hillary. While his boasting that he can get Hillary supporters while he's not sure if she can get his is butch and all, the fact remains to be seen if having Obama supporters in your ranks actually translates to an electoral landslide. Nothing's wrong with hope, but at some point actualizing hope becomes work and I have yet to see concrete plans for that.
I'm for Obama because he is for change. He also is persuasive. He talks good and brushes his teeth. He also has good hand washing technique. I like his shoe polish and his cuff links are shiny. He will look good on a fifty-cent coin. And let's not forget his fingernails are trimmed with no cuticles. That's why he has my vote.
Post a Comment
<< Home