That Which Does Not Kill You, Makes You Bitter
I sometimes attend meetings where kids are expelled from school and their parents have to pick an alternate setting in order to continue their education. The district offers these alternatives because, by law, they have to.
Usually I meet with high school kids. Occasionally a middle school student.
Yesterday, I met with an elementary school child.
This kid was adorable and well-behaved, lots of yes sirs and no ma'ams. His father was dressed in a nice suit, looking sharp and polished.
In other words, not my usual clientele.
I've been at this more than a few years now and can spot the fakers a mile away. This family was not faking their level of intelligence, dignity, or manners. Trust me.
So after the meeting, I had to ask one of my colleagues, "What's the deal? Why did this kid get expelled?"
"He's been taunted all year with racial slurs and finally defended himself. Despite the fact that he's never had a bad mark against him, behavior or otherwise, and despite the fact that his teachers are all devastated because they love him, he's being expelled for fighting. The parents are appealing the decision, but regardless, they say they're through here. Too nasty and bigoted an environment. They're heading back East this summer."
I thought about that beautiful little boy, his demeanor and what he's been through this year. I walked into my classroom, shut the door, and cried.
It hit home. In ways you can't even imagine.
I'm not one who believes there's any such thing as a location cure because you bring yourself with you wherever you go. But what if you're not the problem? If the problem is the location, then leaving is the cure.
And there is a huge problem with a white, right-wing, evangelical location that says to hell with everyone else. Especially if you're not white, right-wing, or evangelical.
Yes, there are racists and bigots back East. But there are also more diverse communities and I hope this little boy and his family find one where he is no longer victimized.
Besides, I don't know many schools back East, or anywhere else for that matter, willing to part with smart kids who have high test scores and good behavior records like they do around here. Dismiss or expel good kids and guess who you end up with? That's just crazy talk.
Some idiots will say this is good for him. Teaches him how to handle problems. Teaches him how to be tough. Or some such nonsense.
Complete and utter idiots.
Another of my colleagues put it beautifully: "He has his whole life to be tough. He shouldn't have to go through this as a child."
I'm with her.
24 Comments:
we all look for ways to justify our decisions. some are right - some are not.
More Christian-bashing - do you have anything else in your mind but to blame Christians for every single problem that ever exists in Colorado Springs? You have offered absolutely NOTHING that shows that the bigotry this child experienced came at the hands of evangelical Christians, but you blame them anyway.
Now THAT is total idiocy....not to mention your own blind hatred clearly on display.
Oh, calm yourself. An area can't tout itself as proudly white, proudly conservative, proudly the evangelical capital of the world, and not have those labels lead to a narrowed thinking that shows up on the playground in its children's attitudes. It's not bashing to point that out.
The only blind hatred you see is reflecting back at you. Look with better eyes than that and perhaps you'll start to see things as they are.
Shalom.
It's hard to see race issues when you never SEE race issues.
"An area" is not responsible for the specific actions of specific teachers and adminstrators. To assume so, and to blame a group within "an area" for whatever happens is so totally absurd as to be laughable.
And I have yet to hear ANYONE in this area touting it as "proudly white." That, again, is totally in your imagination.
Blind hatred again, coming from you, based on nothing but your own prejudices and false assumptions. Nice. Thanks for the fine examples of the democrat party and liberals in action.
Like you say, not your usual clientele. I'm personally tired of having to put up with crap from any kid, cause usually their parents are the problem.
I'd hate to lose any student that isn't a problem and I'm sorry that you have to.
Kate:
You didn't say what race the little boy was, only that he was taunted with racial slurs. My son was bullied as a kid, he is 17 and it still bothers him to this day. He is no longer bullied, but it stayed with him for a long time and he is still dealing with the anger. I hope that little boy and his family find a nice neighborhood to live in, heck, they can move to New Tampa.
Anon - Sure. A small town's values can't be found in its elected officials, laws, barbershops, restaurants, schools, workplaces, playgrounds, churchs, or homes. Right.
Thanks Andy.
JG - The little boys is black.
And another thing, Anon, I bet his parents would disagree with the assessment that many folks in this town are not "proudly white". Explain Doug Bruce. And explain the other anti-immigrant elected officials from the area.
Spare me your defense of a mindset known all over the country.
Nobody can explain Doug Bruce except Doug Bruce. But he's not the entire area.
And like the typical liberal fool, it's obvious that you're completely intellectually incapable of recognizing the difference between LEGAL immigration and ILLEGAL immigration.
But this isn't really surprising.
(P.S. It isn't racist to oppose illegal immigration, despite your delusions to the contrary).
I'm curious, Kate, given your previous statements, whether or not you would agree with the following:
"The "Christian" capitalist regards work as the means to the exploitation of other peoples. The Jew never works as a productive creator without the great aim of becoming the master. He works unproductively, using and enjoying other people's work. And thus we understand the iron sentence which Mommsen once uttered: 'The Christian capitalist is the ferment of decomposition in peoples,' that means that he destroys and must destroy because he completely lacks the conception of an activity which builds up the life of the community. And therefore it is beside the point whether the individual Christian capitalist is 'decent' or not. In himself he carries those characteristics which Nature has given him, and he cannot ever rid himself of those characteristics. And to us he is harmful. Whether he harms us consciously or unconsciously, that is not our affair. We have consciously to concern ourselves for the welfare of our own people."
Does that pretty much sum things up?
As Andy Rooney said on '60 Minutes' a few weeks back:
I don't think being a minority makes you a victim of anything except numbers. The only things I can think of that are truly discriminatory are things like the United Negro College Fund, Jet Magazine, Black Entertainment Television, and Miss Black America. Try to have things like the United Caucasian College Fund, Cloud Magazine, White Entertainment Television, or Miss White America; and see what happens...Jesse Jackson will be knocking down your door.
Guns do not make you a killer. I think killing makes you a killer. You can kill someone with a baseball bat or a car, but no one is trying to ban you from driving to the ball game.
I believe they are called the Boy Scouts for a reason, which is why there are no girls allowed. Girls belong in the Girl Scouts! ARE YOU LISTENING MARTHA BURKE?
I think that if you feel homosexuality is wrong, it is not a phobia, it is an opinion.
I have the right 'NOT' to be tolerant of others because they are different, weird, or tick me off.
When 70% of the people who get arrested are black, in cities where 70% of the population is black, that is not racial profiling; it is the Law of Probability.
I believe that if you are selling me a milkshake, a pack of cigarettes, a newspaper or a hotel room, you must do it in English! As a matter of fact, if you want to be an American citizen, you should have to speak English!
My father and grandfather didn't die in vain so you can leave the countries you were born in to come over and disrespect ours.
I think the police should have every right to shoot you if you threaten them after they tell you to stop. If you can't understand the word 'freeze' or 'stop' in English, see the above lines.
I don't think just because you were not born in this country, you are qualified for any special loan programs, government sponsored bank loans or tax breaks, etc., so you can open a hotel, coffee shop, trinket store, or any other business.
We did not go to the aid of certain foreign countries and risk our lives in wars to defend their freedoms, so that decades later they could come over here and tell us our constitution is a living document; and open to their interpretations.
I don't hate the rich I don't pity the poor
I know pro wrestling is fake, but so are movies and television. That doesn't stop you from watching them.
I think Bill Gates has every right to keep every penny he made and continue to make more. If it ticks you off, go and invent the next operating system that's better, and put your name on the building.
It doesn't take a whole village to raise a child right, but it does take a parent to stand up to the kid; and smack their little behinds when necessary, and say 'NO!'
I think tattoos and piercing are fine if you want them, but please don't pretend they are a political statement. And, please, stay home until that new lip ring heals. I don't want to look at your ugly infected mouth as you serve me French fries!
I am sick of 'Political Correctness.' I know a lot of black people, and not a single one of them was born in Africa ; so how can they be 'African-Americans'? Besides, Africa is a continent. I don't go around saying I am a European-American because my great, great, great, great, great, great grandfather was from Europe. I am proud to be from America and nowhere else
And if you don't like my point of view, tough...
So we have a kid that was expelled for fighting.
......must be his parents fault for not raising him correctly ...?
Are we to assume that events outside of one's homelife has resulted in an unacceptable behavior?
If this kid had been white, but picked on because of some identifiable reason, would we be blaming the parents for his actions?
Also interesting that it is the educators in this community that are making this decision to expell the kid. Why not focus on "educators" as the entity to blame instead of the community?
Sounds like McCarthyism's back. What? Nobody remembers that term? I see a remake of Invasion of the Body Snatchers in our future in five or six years.
What are you even talking about? McCarthyism was all about commies. These fine American's aren't talking about commies.
Oh, Read your Historectomy books will you!
Observer of Man...nonsense. Go peddle crazy somewhere else. As you can see, we're all stocked up here.
andy rooney rocks ---
May 1, 2008
An Op-ed the New York Times Editorial Page Refused to Run
When it comes to illegal immigration, the American people are tired of thirty years of lip service. They want our laws enforced. As Secretary of Homeland Security, I have directed my department to pursue that mandate, using all the tools permitted by law.
This involves a three-fold approach.
First, we stem the flow at the border by increasing the likelihood that illegal entrants – and smugglers of all types – will be detected, apprehended, and removed.
Second, we drive businesses to comply with laws against employing illegal workers.
Third, when we encounter those who are here illegally, we remove them.
Granted, we need a long-term solution involving a temporary worker program, legal immigration reform, and a fair policy to deal with illegal immigrants long-rooted here.
But the American people have demanded that we first demonstrate an effective commitment to enforce current laws. And even those who are sympathetic to the painful circumstances of illegal immigration question any change that might trigger new waves of entrants seeking to benefit from still-future waves of “reform.”
Our policies respond to this demand and to Congress. They may be tough, yet they are fair, and they are succeeding.
That success has now bred a firestorm of opposition. Opponents are driven by factors ranging from an ideological commitment to open borders to reliance on illegal workforces. Apparently, their strategy is to challenge every enforcement action with exaggerated or misleading cries of outrage. These challenges add up to a position that would forbid any effective enforcement.
The New York Times editorial page is a case in point.
Regarding interior enforcement, a March 27, 2008 editorial (“A Foolish Immigration Purge”) attacked our proposal that businesses receiving letters about workers whose names don’t match Social Security numbers clear up the discrepancy within three months. Under this proposal, if a mismatch is caused by an innocent clerical mistake, the mistake is simply corrected. But if it’s caused by an illegal worker carrying a forged identity, the employer must act. Ignoring this distinction, the Times falsely implied that businesses would have to fire workers even for innocent errors.
A December 18, 2006 editorial (“Swift Raids”) protested earlier efforts at workplace enforcement. It was followed by an October 4, 2007 editorial (“Stop the Raids”) which depicted our enforcement efforts on Long Island and elsewhere as trampling on localities. But an April 16, 2008 editorial (“New Jersey’s Immigration Crackdown”) castigated Garden State localities for their enforcement efforts.
Concerning border security, an April 3, 2008 editorial (“Michael Chertoff’s Insult”) condemned our exercise of legal authority to waive certain environmental regulations that would have stopped us from fulfilling the explicit mandate of Congress to put fencing, roads, and lighting in place this year in order to stem drug and human smuggling.
The editorial failed to mention that we had previously conducted multiple environmental reviews or that the Interior Department has complained that some border areas are so endangered by smugglers that visitors and employees are turned away.
Taken together, these examples suggest that in some quarters, no enforcement technique is acceptable. Of course, if none is acceptable, enforcing immigration law becomes impossible.
Perhaps that’s what some critics really want. In a March 4, 2008 editorial (“Border Insecurity”), this newspaper takes aim at the very propriety of defending our sovereignty and our laws:
“From San Diego on the Pacific to Brownsville on the Rio Grande, a steel curtain is descending across the continent. Behind it lies a nation….that has decided to wall itself off….”
In this rewrite of lines from Winston Churchill’s Iron Curtain address, the editorialists outrageously compare America’s attempts to secure its own borders against smugglers with Josef Stalin’s subjugation of Eastern Europe.
In the end, the debate is not about enforcement tactics. It’s about enforcing the rule of law. Do our critics want a country where employers create economic incentives for people to come here illegally? Do they desire an America with open borders and uncontrolled illegal migration? Should federal officials tacitly allow this to happen by rejecting every meaningful effort to enforce the law?
In the end, two truths stand out. We need to continue to discuss reforms to our immigration laws. But we must continue to uphold our current laws by enforcing them.
Michael Chertoff
It was a simple question - either you agree, or you disagree, or you agree with part and disagree with part. I was just trying to find out where you stand with respect to that particular leader's statement.
Interesting that you're afraid to answer the question with a straight answer, though.
Dangling a hook baited with Prime Choice A#1 Looney is not a question, it's a set-up. Just because you stick a question mark at the end doesn't make it relevant to the subject at hand.
So you wouldn't answer the question either, "tiny?"
This is fascinating. Why won't you guys say whether you agree or disagree with the statement? How is it a "set-up?"
I think that they're following Barak's example - they're too chicken to say what they really believe.
Lefties and other communist types never can simply give a straight answer. They don't have the courage to actually commit to anything long enough.
Yep.....figures......days later, and they still don't have the balls.
Boy, you got that right!!!!
Post a Comment
<< Home